What happened
A registrant challenged the retroactive application of the 2011 amendments to the Kansas Offender Registration Act under the federal Ex Post Facto Clause. Kansas has no ex post facto clause of its own.
304 Kan. 291, 373 P.3d 750 (2016)
Kansas’s 2011 registry amendments were held punitive — in a decision overruled the same day it was filed.
Overruled. Overruled by State v. Petersen-Beard, filed the same day. Final word on that state’s own law and constitution — in that state only.
A registrant challenged the retroactive application of the 2011 amendments to the Kansas Offender Registration Act under the federal Ex Post Facto Clause. Kansas has no ex post facto clause of its own.
By 4–3, in an opinion by Justice Johnson, the court held the 2011 amendments punitive, so they could not apply retroactively. The majority included a senior judge sitting in a vacant seat.
Filed the same day as Petersen-Beard, which overruled it, Thompson shows how much can turn on which judges hear a case: both decisions were 4–3.
It has no remaining force; Kansas follows Petersen-Beard.
Last verified against the sources above on September 30, 2026.
These are plain-language summaries of court decisions, written for general education. A ruling binds only the courts beneath the court that issued it, later decisions and new laws can change what it means, and how it applies to any one person depends on facts a summary cannot capture. Read the opinion itself, and talk to a lawyer licensed in your state before relying on any case. This page is not legal advice.