Myths vs. Reality

What People Believe About the Registry — and What the Law Says

Much of what people believe about sex offender registration comes from rumor, old news or another state’s law. Each myth here is checked against the statute, court decision or federal rule that actually governs it, with the source linked so you can read it yourself. Laws differ by state, so every answer shows where the rule comes from.

120 myths · 9 topics · 209 statutes, cases and official sources · Last verified October 5, 2026

How each answer works

Every card states the myth, gives the reality in plain language, explains what the law says, and lists its sources — federal law and rules, the state statute in LawLookup, and the court decision in the Case Law Library. Open a card to read it; use “Link to this answer” to share that one myth.

01 · Registration · 21 myths

Who has to register, for how long, and what has to be reported?

Registration is a duty set by statute — federal SORNA sets a floor and every state writes its own law on top of it. These myths are about who is covered, how long it lasts, what has to be reported and how the duty can end.

Everyone on the registry must register for life.

False — federal law uses 15 years, 25 years or life, and states differ widely.
The myth

Once someone is placed on a sex offender registry, they can never be removed.

The reality

Registration periods vary widely. Federal law sets 15 years for Tier I, 25 years for Tier II and life for Tier III, with reductions for a clean record. Many states let some registrants petition for removal after a set number of years; others require lifetime registration for certain offenses — or for every adult.

What the law says

Under SORNA a Tier I registrant who keeps a clean record for 10 years — no new sex offense, no new felony-level conviction, supervision completed and an approved treatment program completed — has the 15-year period reduced by five years. A Tier III juvenile who keeps a clean record for 25 years can have the lifetime period reduced.

State terms vary from the federal ones. Alabama’s registration lasts for life for adults; Kansas sets its own durations and termination rules; California moved from lifetime registration for everyone to a tiered system with petitions for termination.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20915

Every registrant appears on a public website.

False — states may keep some registrants, and many juveniles, off the public site.
The myth

All people required to register are publicly listed online.

The reality

Not every registrant appears on a public registry. Federal law lets jurisdictions exempt some Tier I registrants from public disclosure, federal guidelines give states discretion over juveniles, and some states let a court restrict public dissemination — all while the person stays registered with law enforcement.

What the law says

SORNA’s optional exemptions cover information about a Tier I offender convicted of an offense other than a specified offense against a minor, along with an employer’s name and a school’s name. Connecticut lets a court restrict public dissemination in defined cases; New Hampshire provides for removal from the public list; California posts only the ZIP code or community for some registrants.

Someone who is not on a state’s public site will not appear on the national public website either, because that site only searches what the states publish.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20920(c); 76 Fed. Reg. 1630 (2011)

Registry information is always accurate.

False — registries depend on timely reports and data entry, and errors happen.
The myth

Every address, photograph and personal detail on every registry is guaranteed to be current and correct.

The reality

Agencies work to keep records accurate, but mistakes, delays, outdated information and reporting errors happen. When accuracy matters, verify with the registering agency rather than relying on a copy of the listing.

What the law says

A registry is only as current as its last update: the registrant has three business days to report a change, and the agency then has to process and publish it. The national public website draws its listings from the states’ own public registries, so it can be no more current than they are.

Third-party background check companies that resell registry data are subject to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which requires reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy and a dispute process when a report is wrong.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20913(c); 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681e(b), 1681i

Moving to another state removes registration requirements.

False — the new state registers you, and failing to do so after moving is a federal crime.
The myth

A registrant can avoid registration simply by relocating to a different state.

The reality

Moving does not end registration. Federal law requires registration where a person lives, works or studies, and most states register people who arrive with a qualifying out-of-state conviction. Specific requirements vary by jurisdiction.

What the law says

Failing to register after traveling interstate is a federal crime punishable by up to 10 years in prison. In Carr v. United States the Supreme Court held that the travel must come after SORNA took effect — but that rarely helps anyone today.

The new state’s rules may be stricter than the old one’s: a different term, a different tier, a residency rule. Hawaii, for example, covers people designated as offenders by another state. Leaving can require notice to the old state too.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20913(a); 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a)

Registry laws are identical in every state.

False — deadlines, fees, terms and restrictions differ state by state.
The myth

Every state has the same registration rules, reporting requirements and restrictions.

The reality

Registry laws differ substantially among states. Reporting schedules, public disclosure, residency rules, travel requirements, fees and removal procedures all vary.

What the law says

A few concrete differences: federal law sets three business days to report a change; Florida sets 48 hours. California forbids charging a fee to register; Kansas charges $20 each quarter. Alabama registers adults for life; North Carolina allows a petition to end its 30-year term.

The differences matter most when someone moves, works across a state line or visits for an extended stay — both states’ rules can apply.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20913(c); Fla. Stat. § 943.0435(4); Cal. Penal Code § 290.012; K.S.A. 22-4905

Removing a registration requirement is impossible.

False — most states have some route off; how wide the door is varies.
The myth

Once registration begins, it can never end under any circumstances.

The reality

Many states let certain registrants petition for removal or termination once they meet the statutory requirements, and some registrations simply end when the term runs out. Whether relief is available depends on the jurisdiction and the offense.

What the law says

Examples: Florida has a removal process for close-in-age (“Romeo and Juliet”) cases; California, Kansas, Michigan, Georgia and North Carolina provide petitions to end or discontinue registration; New York allows a petition for relief or a lower risk level; South Carolina lets SLED, the state law enforcement agency, terminate some Tier I and Tier II registrations.

Courts can also take people off. In September 2026, after the Michigan Supreme Court’s order in People v. Smith, the state police removed more than 20,000 people from Michigan’s registry within days. Courts in Florida and North Carolina have also issued 2026 rulings on how removal petitions work.

See the lawFla. Stat. § 943.04354; Cal. Penal Code § 290.5; N.Y. Correct. Law § 168-o

Registrants never have to update their information.

False — changes have to be reported within days, plus regular in-person check-ins.
The myth

Once someone registers, no further reporting is required.

The reality

Registration is ongoing. Federal law requires an in-person update within three business days of a change of name, residence, employment or student status, plus periodic in-person verification. States add their own items and deadlines — vehicles, internet identifiers, travel.

What the law says

SORNA’s verification schedule is set by tier: once a year for Tier I, every six months for Tier II and every three months for Tier III.

State deadlines can be shorter: Florida requires many changes within 48 hours. Nevada and Vermont require name, residence, job or school changes within three days, and Vermont also requires a report within three days of a child moving into the home.

See the law34 U.S.C. §§ 20913(c), 20918

Federal law creates one nationwide registry system.

False — SORNA sets minimum standards; every state, territory and tribe runs its own registry.
The myth

Registration works exactly the same everywhere because federal law completely controls it.

The reality

Federal law sets minimum standards, but each state, territory and participating tribe runs its own registry with its own procedures and requirements. States that do not substantially implement SORNA lose part of a federal grant — they are not forced to adopt it.

What the law says

The penalty for not complying is a 10% cut in Byrne JAG funding. The FBI keeps a National Sex Offender Registry for law enforcement; the public national website is a search tool across the jurisdictions’ own sites.

How SORNA applies to people convicted before it existed was left to the Attorney General — the Supreme Court decided what that meant in Reynolds and upheld the delegation in Gundy.

See the law34 U.S.C. §§ 20912, 20921, 20922, 20927

There is no way to fix a mistake on a registry listing.

False — the registering agency can correct its record, and background check companies must investigate disputes.
The myth

Official registry records are always free of errors — and if one isn’t, nothing can be done.

The reality

Clerical errors, outdated information and reporting mistakes happen, and there are ways to fix them. Start with the agency that maintains the registration record, and dispute any copy of the error a background check company is reporting.

What the law says

Because the registry is built from what the registrant reports and what the agency enters, an error in a listing is usually corrected by the registering agency. Keep copies of what you submitted and when.

A background check company must reinvestigate a disputed item free of charge and correct or delete it if it is inaccurate or cannot be verified. Registry information on third-party sites is often a stale copy — fixing the official record does not automatically fix theirs.

See the law15 U.S.C. § 1681i; 34 U.S.C. § 20913(c)

All registry offenses involve physical contact.

False — many registrable offenses involve no contact at all.
The myth

Every registrable offense includes physical sexual contact with another person.

The reality

Registrable offenses vary by state, and many involve no physical contact — possession of illegal images, voyeurism, solicitation, indecent exposure and some kidnapping offenses among them. The list is set by statute and differs between jurisdictions.

What the law says

SORNA’s list of specified offenses against a minor includes solicitation to engage in sexual conduct, video voyeurism, possession of child sexual abuse material, and kidnapping or false imprisonment of a minor by a non-parent. Indiana’s registrable offenses include possession of child sexual abuse material and, when the victim is a minor and the offender is not a parent, kidnapping and criminal confinement.

Texas’s list includes indecent exposure on a second conviction and several non-sexual offenses where the victim was a child.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20911(7); IC 11-8-8-5; Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 62.001(5)

Registry requirements never change.

False — legislatures amend them often and courts regularly reshape them.
The myth

Registration laws remain the same forever.

The reality

Registry laws change regularly through legislation and court decisions. Reporting requirements, registration periods and restrictions are amended over time — sometimes making them stricter, sometimes ending registration for thousands of people at once.

What the law says

Michigan rewrote its law in 2011 and 2021; its Supreme Court held the 2011 law punitive in Betts, and in September 2026 held in People v. Smith that the 2021 law cannot reach pre-2011 offenses. Pennsylvania wrote a separate scheme for older offenses after Muniz, which its high court then upheld in Lacombe.

Federal law changes too: International Megan’s Law added the passport identifier in 2016, and the Justice Department issued a final SORNA rule in 2021.

See the law86 Fed. Reg. 69856 (2021)

Every state classifies offenders the same way.

False — some use offense-based tiers, some use risk levels, and the words don’t match.
The myth

Risk levels and registration tiers are identical across the United States.

The reality

Classification systems differ significantly. SORNA uses three offense-based tiers. Some states use those tiers, some assign risk levels through an assessment, some use both, and the same word — “Level 2,” “Tier II” — can mean different things in different states.

What the law says

Minnesota assigns risk levels through a committee, with administrative review; Montana’s levels come from a licensed evaluator’s report at sentencing; New York and Massachusetts assign levels through a board or court process with a route to modify them.

A move between states can change a person’s classification entirely.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20911(2)–(4); Minn. Stat. § 244.052; Mont. Code Ann. § 46-23-509

Courts always uphold registry laws.

False — many courts have limited or struck parts of registry laws.
The myth

A registrant’s legal status can never change, because courts never rule against registry laws.

The reality

Courts have ruled against registry laws many times. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld Alaska’s registry in 2003, but federal and state courts have since struck down specific requirements and held whole schemes punitive as applied to older offenses — changing the status of thousands of people.

What the law says

Examples: the Sixth Circuit held Michigan’s registry punitive in Does v. Snyder; the high courts of Michigan, Pennsylvania, Indiana, Ohio, Alaska, Maine, Maryland, Oklahoma and New Hampshire have each held all or part of their state’s law could not be applied retroactively; the Supreme Court struck North Carolina’s social media ban.

Courts also uphold a great deal — Kansas’s high court found lifetime registration is not punishment, and Pennsylvania’s rewritten scheme survived. Outcomes depend on the court, the law and the person.

See the lawSmith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 84 (2003); Does #1–5 v. Snyder, 834 F.3d 696 (6th Cir. 2016)

Reading social media tells you the law.

False — posts and videos are often out of date or wrong; read the statute.
The myth

Posts, videos or comments online are reliable legal authority for registry requirements.

The reality

Social media often carries outdated or incorrect legal information. The reliable sources are the current statutes, court decisions, the agencies that run the registries, and a lawyer licensed in your state.

What the law says

Registry law changes often, and a post that was right two years ago can be wrong today. For federal law, the Justice Department’s SMART Office publishes SORNA, its regulations and its guidelines. For your state, read the statute itself — LawLookup links each section to its official source.

When a rule matters to you, ask your registering agency in writing and keep the answer.

See the lawSMART Office; state statutes

If no one told you about a registration duty, you can never be charged.

Partly true — due process requires knowledge or reason to know, but notice is usually given and the burden is real.
The myth

As long as no official explained the requirement, failing to register is never a crime — or the reverse, that not knowing is never a defense.

The reality

Both versions are wrong. In Lambert v. California the Supreme Court held that a person cannot be convicted of failing to register if they had no actual knowledge of the duty and no probability of knowing it. But the law requires officials to give notice, and once a person has been told — usually in writing at sentencing or release — the duty applies whether or not they remember the details.

What the law says

SORNA requires officials, shortly before release or at sentencing, to inform the offender of the duties, explain them, and have the offender read and sign a form saying the duty was explained and understood. The federal crime requires that the person knowingly fail to register or update.

Uncontrollable circumstances are a separate affirmative defense under federal law — but only if the person did not recklessly create them and complied as soon as they ended.

See the lawLambert v. California, 355 U.S. 225 (1957); 34 U.S.C. § 20919; 18 U.S.C. § 2250(c)

A plea deal or deferred adjudication means you won’t have to register.

Often yes — many states count pleas and deferred judgments as convictions for registration.
The myth

Without a trial or a prison sentence, there is no registration requirement.

The reality

A guilty or no-contest plea is a conviction like any other, and many states also count deferred adjudications and deferred judgments for registration purposes. A trial and a prison sentence are not needed.

What the law says

Texas defines a “reportable conviction or adjudication” to include a deferred adjudication; Colorado defines “convicted” to include a plea of guilty or no contest, a juvenile disposition, and a deferred judgment or deferred adjudication.

Whether a plea will require registration — and for how long — is a question to settle with defense counsel before entering it.

See the lawTex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 62.001(5); C.R.S. § 16-22-102

Juveniles are never put on the registry.

False — federal law covers some adjudications at 14 and up, and states vary widely.
The myth

A juvenile adjudication can never lead to sex offender registration.

The reality

Federal law treats a juvenile adjudication as a conviction for registration when the child was 14 or older and the offense was comparable to or more severe than aggravated sexual abuse. States may register juveniles more broadly — or more narrowly — and many provide earlier routes off.

What the law says

Under SORNA, a juvenile registered in Tier III can have the lifetime period reduced after keeping a clean record for 25 years, and federal guidelines leave jurisdictions discretion not to post juveniles on the public website.

Examples of state rules: Arizona’s juvenile registration generally ends at 25 and can be terminated earlier by a court; Illinois lets adjudicated juveniles petition to terminate registration; Pennsylvania has its own termination process for juvenile offenders.

See the law34 U.S.C. §§ 20911(8), 20915(b); 76 Fed. Reg. 1630 (2011)

Registering is free.

Depends on the state — some charge yearly or quarterly fees; California forbids them.
The myth

Registration costs nothing beyond the time it takes to report.

The reality

Many states charge registrants a fee. Kansas charges $20 at each quarterly registration; Michigan charges an annual fee; West Virginia charges a yearly fee; Tennessee charges an annual administrative fee. California, by contrast, forbids any entity from requiring a fee to register or update.

What the law says

Unpaid fees can have consequences of their own. In August 2026 the Kansas Supreme Court reversed three convictions for failing to pay the $20 quarterly fee, though the justices split on why — so the question of how unpaid fees are enforced is still developing.

Check whether your state waives fees for indigent registrants and how to ask for a waiver.

See the lawK.S.A. 22-4905; MCL 28.725a; W. Va. Code § 15-12-2; Cal. Penal Code § 290.012(d)

A pardon, set-aside or expungement always ends registration.

Not always — some states end registration when a conviction is set aside or vacated; many don’t allow it.
The myth

Clearing a conviction from the record automatically ends the duty to register, everywhere.

The reality

It depends on the state and on what kind of relief was granted. Some statutes end registration when the conviction is set aside, expunged or vacated. Others exclude sex offenses from expungement altogether, or keep the registration duty even after a record is sealed.

What the law says

Michigan provides for discontinuation of registration when the conviction is set aside or expunged; Rhode Island ends the duty when a conviction is vacated. In many other states the registration statute and the expungement statute must be read together — and the answer is often no.

If you are considering any kind of record relief, ask specifically whether it will end registration before you rely on it.

See the lawMCL 28.725(16); R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-37.1-2(d)(2)

Out-of-state and foreign convictions don’t count here.

False — SORNA and state laws reach other states’, federal, military, tribal and most foreign convictions.
The myth

A conviction from another state, the military or another country does not trigger registration in a new state.

The reality

Federal law counts convictions under state, local, tribal, foreign and military law, and requires registration within three business days of moving to a jurisdiction. A foreign conviction is excluded only if it was not obtained with sufficient safeguards for fundamental fairness and due process.

What the law says

The federal rule sets specific deadlines for people with federal, military or foreign convictions who move into a jurisdiction. State laws do the same in their own terms — Hawaii, for example, covers people designated as offenders by another state.

The new state may classify the out-of-state offense differently than the original state did.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20911(5)(B), (6); 28 C.F.R. § 72.7

Changing your name gets you off the registry.

False — a name change must be reported, and some states restrict name changes outright.
The myth

A new legal name means a fresh start with no registration duty.

The reality

A name change does not end registration — it is one of the changes that must be reported in person within three business days under federal law. Some states go further and restrict registrants from changing their names at all.

What the law says

Mississippi makes it unlawful for a registrant to change their name except through marriage or divorce. Illinois makes it a felony for a registrant to petition for a name change unless it is due to marriage, religious beliefs, status as a trafficking victim or gender identity. Washington lets a court deny a name change that would interfere with legitimate law enforcement interests.

Alabama and North Carolina require an in-person update after any name change.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20913(c); Miss. Code Ann. § 45-33-30; 730 ILCS 150/10; RCW 9A.44.130

02 · What the registry is · 16 myths

What does a registry listing actually tell you?

A registry is a list of people convicted of certain offenses, kept by a state, territory or tribe. It is not a risk score, a case file or a criminal sentence. These myths are about what a listing does and does not mean.

Everyone on a registry is a violent predator.

False — registries cover a wide range of offenses, many of them non-violent.
The myth

Every person required to register committed a violent sexual assault.

The reality

Registry laws cover a wide range of offenses. Depending on the state, registrants may include people convicted of non-violent offenses, consensual relationships that violated age-of-consent laws, possession of illegal images, public indecency, or other crimes. The offense, the circumstances and the risk level vary significantly from person to person.

What the law says

Federal law sorts registrants into three tiers by the offense of conviction. Its definition of a “specified offense against a minor” includes conduct with no physical contact at all — solicitation, video voyeurism, and possession of child sexual abuse material among them.

SORNA also excludes some conduct: an offense involving consensual sexual conduct is not a SORNA sex offense if the victim was an adult (unless under the offender’s custodial authority), or if the victim was at least 13 and the offender was not more than four years older. States can, and many do, register more broadly than that federal floor.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20911(1)–(7)

Everyone on the registry has committed the same type of crime.

False — registrable offenses range from contact offenses to non-contact and even non-sexual ones.
The myth

Registry offenses are all essentially identical.

The reality

Registry offenses vary considerably in severity, circumstances, victim age, use of force and statutory elements. Two people on the same registry may have committed very different crimes with very different legal consequences.

What the law says

Texas’s list of reportable convictions, for example, runs from continuous sexual abuse of a child to indecent exposure, and also includes some kidnapping and unlawful-restraint offenses when the victim was a minor. Federal law likewise covers kidnapping and false imprisonment of a minor by someone other than a parent.

Some registration requirements reach conduct that is not a sexual assault at all. A federal court let a challenge proceed to Tennessee’s requirement that people convicted of aggravated prostitution — an offense defined by HIV status — register as sex offenders.

See the lawTex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 62.001(5); 34 U.S.C. § 20911(7)

The registry measures a person's current danger to society.

False — most registries are based on the conviction, not on an assessment of risk today.
The myth

Being listed on the registry always reflects an individual’s present level of risk.

The reality

Registry placement is generally based on the conviction. Whether a registry uses individual risk assessments varies by jurisdiction, and registration alone does not show a person’s current level of risk.

What the law says

In Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe (2003) the Supreme Court held that a registry based only on the fact of conviction needs no hearing on current dangerousness — because it does not claim to measure it. Connecticut’s own site said as much.

Some states do assess risk. Minnesota assigns risk levels and provides an administrative review of the level; Rhode Island’s board of review sets risk levels; Montana uses an evaluator’s recommended level at sentencing. Those levels are separate from offense-based tiers.

See the lawConnecticut Dept. of Public Safety v. Doe, 538 U.S. 1 (2003)

The registry prevents all future crimes.

No registry can — research on how much they help is mixed.
The myth

Sex offender registries completely eliminate repeat offenses.

The reality

Registries are one public safety tool among many. Research on their effectiveness is mixed, and no registry system can guarantee that future crimes will not occur.

What the law says

The Justice Department’s SMART Office collected the research on registration and community notification in its Sex Offender Management Assessment and Planning Initiative; the studies it reviewed reach mixed conclusions about whether these laws reduce reoffending.

The Bureau of Justice Statistics followed people released from state prisons in 30 states in 2005 for nine years: 7.7% of released sex offenders were arrested for rape or sexual assault in that period — more than three times the rate for other released prisoners, and far from zero, but also far from most.

See the lawBJS, Recidivism of Sex Offenders Released from State Prison (2019); SMART Office, SOMAPI

All registrants are repeat offenders.

False — one qualifying conviction is enough to register.
The myth

Everyone listed on a registry has committed multiple sex offenses.

The reality

One qualifying conviction is enough to require registration, and many registrants have only one. Registry status alone does not show whether someone has reoffended.

What the law says

In the Bureau of Justice Statistics’ nine-year study of people released from state prisons in 2005, 7.7% of released sex offenders were arrested for rape or sexual assault during the follow-up period. About two-thirds were arrested for some crime, most often not a sex offense.

Repeat offenses do change a person’s place on the registry: under SORNA a later sex offense can move someone to a higher tier, and many states lengthen terms for second offenses.

See the lawBJS (2019); 34 U.S.C. § 20911(3)–(4)

Most sexual offenses are committed by someone already on the registry.

No — a registry can only list people with a prior conviction, and the data point the other way.
The myth

Checking the registry identifies most of the people who will commit a sexual offense.

The reality

Registries are one part of public safety policy, alongside prevention, treatment, supervision, education and law enforcement, and no single measure guarantees safety. A registry can only list people who already have a qualifying conviction, so it cannot flag someone with no record.

What the law says

The Bureau of Justice Statistics’ nine-year study of people released from state prisons in 2005 found that released sex offenders made up 5% of those releases and accounted for 16% of the cohort’s later arrests for rape or sexual assault. The other 84% of those arrests were of people who had been in prison for other crimes.

That study tracked only people released from prison, so it does not measure all offending — but it is the federal government’s own measure of how much of the problem a list of prior offenders can see.

See the lawBureau of Justice Statistics (2019)

The registry tells the whole story of a case.

False — listings are short, and the law requires some details to be left out.
The myth

Everything someone needs to know about an offense is available on the public registry.

The reality

Registry entries are brief. They rarely include the facts, legal issues, court proceedings or mitigating circumstances of a case, and federal law requires some information to be left off public sites.

What the law says

Public sites must exclude the victim’s identity, the registrant’s Social Security number and any arrests that did not lead to a conviction. A listing typically shows the statute of conviction — which can cover very different conduct — not what happened.

For the full picture, the court file is the source. Courts have upheld publishing what is already a matter of public record.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20920(b)

Everyone on the registry has the same reporting schedule.

False — schedules vary by tier and state, from yearly to every week.
The myth

Every registrant reports to law enforcement with the same frequency.

The reality

Reporting frequency depends on the jurisdiction and the registrant’s tier or status. Some people report annually; others every six months, every three months, monthly or even weekly.

What the law says

Federal law sets annual, six-month and three-month verification for Tiers I, II and III. Arkansas requires in-person verification every six months, with shorter intervals for some, and every 30 days for registrants who are homeless. Alabama requires quarterly verification, and weekly reports from homeless registrants. Texas requires verification every 90 days for some repeat sexually violent offenders.

Change reports come on top of the regular schedule.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20918; Ark. Code § 12-12-909(a); Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 62.058

The registry predicts future behavior.

False — registration follows a conviction; it is not a risk assessment.
The myth

A person’s registry status alone accurately predicts whether they will commit another offense.

The reality

Registration is a legal consequence of a conviction, not a prediction. Assessing future risk is a separate, individual process that depends on many factors.

What the law says

The Supreme Court has upheld registries that make no claim about current dangerousness. Where a state does assess risk, it uses a separate process — an evaluator, a board or a hearing — and the result is a risk level, which is not the same as a tier.

Federal data show most released sex offenders were not rearrested for a sex offense within nine years; 7.7% were arrested for rape or sexual assault.

See the lawConnecticut Dept. of Public Safety v. Doe, 538 U.S. 1 (2003); BJS (2019)

Everyone on the registry offended against a child.

False — registries also cover adult-victim and victimless offenses, and the law treats them differently.
The myth

Registry status alone proves a person is a danger to children.

The reality

Registries include offenses against adults as well as against minors, and some offenses with no identifiable victim. The registry reflects a conviction; it does not by itself show who the victim was or a person’s present risk.

What the law says

Federal law draws the line itself: it defines a separate category of “specified offenses against a minor,” and International Megan’s Law’s passport identifier applies only to people registered for an offense against a minor.

Many state restrictions are drawn the same way. Illinois’s school, park and employment bans apply to a “child sex offender,” not to every registrant.

See the law34 U.S.C. §§ 20911(7), 21503(f)

The registry always reflects current information immediately.

False — the law builds in days for reporting, and publishing takes longer.
The myth

Changes to addresses, employment or photographs appear instantly on every registry.

The reality

Updates take time. The registrant has days to report a change, the agency then processes it, and only then does it reach the public site — and later still any national or third-party copy.

What the law says

Under SORNA a registrant has three business days to report a change; the jurisdiction must then immediately send it to every other jurisdiction where the person registers. The national public website shows what the state sites publish.

If the timing of a listing matters — for a lease, a job or a court case — ask the registering agency for the current record.

See the law34 U.S.C. §§ 20913(c), 20920, 20922

The public website shows everything in a registrant’s file.

False — law enforcement holds far more than the public site shows.
The myth

A registry listing provides a complete picture of who someone is today and everything the government knows about them.

The reality

Public listings contain limited legal and identifying information. They do not describe rehabilitation, education, work history, family support or treatment — and the law enforcement registry behind them holds information the public never sees.

What the law says

The registry itself must include, among other things, the person’s Social Security number, every residence, employer and school, vehicle information, fingerprints, palm prints, a DNA sample, a photograph and the text of the law of conviction. Public sites must leave out the Social Security number, the victim’s identity and arrests that did not lead to conviction, and may leave out employer and school names.

California posts only a ZIP code or community, not an address, for some registrants.

See the law34 U.S.C. §§ 20914, 20920(b)–(c)

A court ruling in one state changes the law everywhere.

False — most rulings bind only one state or one federal circuit.
The myth

If something is true in one state — or a court decides it there — it must be true everywhere.

The reality

Registry laws vary by state, territory, tribe and federal requirement, and so does the reach of a court decision. A state high court’s ruling binds that state only; a federal appeals court binds the states in its circuit; only the U.S. Supreme Court binds the whole country on a federal question.

What the law says

People v. Betts took thousands of people off Michigan’s registry and changed nothing in Ohio. Does v. Snyder binds federal courts in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee, and is only persuasive elsewhere. Alaska’s own court found the same registry the Supreme Court upheld in Smith v. Doe punitive under the Alaska Constitution.

Always check the law — and the court decisions — in the jurisdiction involved.

See the lawCase Law Library: how far a ruling reaches

Myths are harmless.

False — a wrong belief can mean a missed deadline, and that can be a felony.
The myth

False information about registry laws has no real-world consequences.

The reality

Misinformation leads to unnecessary fear, unlawful decisions, missed opportunities and confusion about legal obligations — for registrants, families, employers and the public. Knowing the law starts with separating myth from fact.

What the law says

The stakes are concrete. Knowingly failing to register or update after interstate travel is a federal crime carrying up to 10 years in prison, and every state makes failure to register a crime too. Believing a short trip or a new username “doesn’t count” is how many people end up charged.

The other direction matters too: believing a restriction applies when it doesn’t keeps people from work, housing, family events and the vote. The Supreme Court held in Lambert v. California that a person cannot be convicted of failing to register when they had no knowledge of the duty and no reason to know — which is why accurate notice matters.

See the law18 U.S.C. § 2250; Lambert v. California, 355 U.S. 225 (1957)

Registration is part of the criminal sentence.

Not under the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2003 decision — but several state courts disagree about their own laws.
The myth

Registration is part of the punishment a judge hands down, so it ends when the sentence ends.

The reality

In Smith v. Doe (2003) the Supreme Court held that Alaska’s registry is a civil regulatory scheme, not punishment. That is why registration can last long after a sentence ends and can apply to people convicted before a law was passed. But courts apply the same test to each law, and several have found heavier registries punitive.

What the law says

The Sixth Circuit found Michigan’s registry punitive in Does v. Snyder; the Michigan, Pennsylvania and Indiana high courts reached similar conclusions about their own laws. In 2026, in Ellingburg v. United States, the Supreme Court applied the Smith framework to hold federal criminal restitution is punishment — the first major use of that test in years.

Whether a registry is “punishment” matters most for retroactivity: the Constitution forbids increasing punishment after the fact.

See the lawSmith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 84 (2003); Ellingburg v. United States, 607 U.S. 163 (2026)

The national sex offender website is its own federal registry.

False — it is a search portal across the states’ public registries, not a separate list.
The myth

NSOPW is a separate federal registry with its own list of people and its own rules.

The reality

The Dru Sjodin National Sex Offender Public Website is a search tool that lets the public search every participating jurisdiction’s public registry at once. The listings and their accuracy come from the states, territories and tribes. A separate National Sex Offender Registry, kept at the FBI, is for law enforcement.

What the law says

Because the public site shows what each jurisdiction publishes, a person a state keeps off its public site does not appear there either, and a correction has to be made by the jurisdiction.

To find out what applies to you, go to the jurisdiction’s own registry and statute — not the national search.

See the law34 U.S.C. §§ 20921, 20922

03 · Probation & supervision · 14 myths

How is registration different from probation, parole and supervised release?

Supervision is part of a sentence, set by a judge or parole board and ended when the term ends. Registration is a separate civil duty that often lasts far longer. Mixing the two up is one of the most common — and most costly — mistakes.

Being on the registry means someone is still on probation.

False — registration usually outlasts supervision by years or decades.
The myth

All registrants remain under court supervision.

The reality

Registration and supervision are different legal requirements. Many registrants finish probation or parole and remain subject to registration for years — or for life — afterward.

What the law says

The federal registration period runs for the full term of years whatever the sentence was, and only time in custody or civil commitment is excluded from it. Supervision ends when its term ends.

The U.S. Supreme Court has treated registration as a civil regulatory scheme rather than part of the sentence, which is one reason it continues after the sentence is complete. Some state courts have reached different conclusions about their own laws.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20915(a); Smith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 84 (2003)

Probation rules and registry rules are the same.

False — supervision conditions are set for a person and end; registration rules are set by statute.
The myth

Registration requirements are identical to probation conditions.

The reality

Probation and parole conditions are imposed by a court or parole board and usually end when supervision ends. Registration requirements are separate legal obligations written into statute that may continue long after supervision has expired.

What the law says

Federal law lists the conditions a court may impose on probation and supervised release and requires them to be tailored to the person. Texas law, for example, requires the parole panel to bar certain paroled registrants from using the internet to contact minors — and lets the panel modify that condition for a parent who is not otherwise barred from contact, or when it keeps the person from school or work.

A violation of a supervision condition is handled by the supervising court or board. A registration violation is a separate crime — which means the same act can sometimes be both.

See the law18 U.S.C. §§ 3563(b), 3583(d); 34 U.S.C. § 20915

Every registrant wears a GPS monitor.

False — GPS comes from specific statutes or supervision, not registration itself.
The myth

Electronic monitoring is required for everyone listed on the registry.

The reality

GPS monitoring is ordered in specific cases or as part of supervision. Most registrants are not monitored simply because they are registered.

What the law says

Where statutes require it, they are specific: Massachusetts requires GPS for homeless registrants; Idaho for violent sexual predators during probation or parole; Florida imposes electronic monitoring with community control for some failure-to-register convictions; Missouri for a third failure-to-register offense.

In Grady v. North Carolina (2015) the Supreme Court held that attaching a GPS monitor is a Fourth Amendment search — so it must be reasonable, even when the state calls the program civil.

See the lawGrady v. North Carolina, 575 U.S. 306 (2015); M.G.L. c. 6, § 178F¾

Registration automatically extends probation.

False — the two run on separate clocks.
The myth

A person remains on probation as long as they remain on the registry.

The reality

Probation and registration are separate obligations. Finishing probation does not end registration, and staying registered does not extend probation.

What the law says

The federal registration period is a fixed term for the tier. Supervision terms are set by the sentence. A registration violation can lead to a new conviction and a new term of supervision — that is the main way registration and probation become linked.

Arizona is an example of a state that does connect them on purpose: for some young registrants, the court holds an annual probation review and can suspend or terminate registration at the same time.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20915; A.R.S. § 13-923

Every registrant on supervision has the same conditions.

False — conditions are set for each person, within limits the law sets.
The myth

Probation for a sex offense always comes with one standard list of rules that applies to everyone.

The reality

Supervision conditions are imposed person by person. Statutes list mandatory conditions and the discretionary ones a court or board may add, and federal law requires discretionary conditions to be reasonably related to the case and no more restrictive than reasonably necessary.

What the law says

Federal probation and supervised release both have a short list of mandatory conditions — including registration where SORNA requires it — and a long list of discretionary ones. State systems work the same way. Nevada’s statute, for example, lists conditions for probation after a sex offense, including an approved residence and a 1,000-foot restriction for Tier III offenders.

Texas requires the parole panel to impose internet conditions on some paroled registrants — no contact with minors online, and inspection of devices — and lets the panel modify the contact condition when it keeps the person from school or work and causes undue hardship.

See the law18 U.S.C. §§ 3563, 3583(d); Nev. Rev. Stat. § 176A.410; Tex. Gov’t Code § 508.1861

A probation officer needs a warrant to search a registrant’s home.

Often not needed — the Supreme Court allows supervision searches on less than a warrant.
The myth

Officers can never enter or search a home without a warrant, whatever the person’s supervision status.

The reality

People on probation or parole have reduced Fourth Amendment protection. The Supreme Court has upheld probation searches under a state regulation requiring “reasonable grounds,” searches based on reasonable suspicion under a probation search condition, and suspicionless searches of parolees where state law authorizes them.

What the law says

The three cases are Griffin v. Wisconsin (1987), United States v. Knights (2001) and Samson v. California (2006). What is allowed depends on the person’s status and the terms of their supervision.

Registration alone is different. A registrant who is off supervision keeps ordinary Fourth Amendment rights, though some states authorize address-verification visits — Idaho lets the sheriff visit the residence at any reasonable time to verify the address. A visit to confirm an address is not a search of the home.

See the lawGriffin v. Wisconsin, 483 U.S. 868 (1987); United States v. Knights, 534 U.S. 112 (2001); Samson v. California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006)

Supervision conditions follow you for life.

No — conditions end with the term; statutory restrictions and registration may continue.
The myth

Rules from probation — no internet, no contact, curfew — stay in force forever once imposed.

The reality

Supervision conditions end when supervision ends. What can continue is anything written into statute — registration itself, and in some states residency, presence or co-residence restrictions — because those apply to registrants as a class, not as a term of a sentence.

What the law says

Federal law allows supervised release for sex offenses to run for any term of five years or more, including life — in which case the conditions do last as long as the term. Otherwise, a condition that was part of a sentence expires with it.

Alabama’s residency and co-residence rules are an example of statutory restrictions that apply whether or not the person is on supervision.

See the law18 U.S.C. § 3583(k); Ala. Code § 15-20A-11

GPS monitoring can never be challenged.

False — GPS monitoring is a search, so it has to be reasonable.
The myth

If the state calls GPS monitoring civil, a court cannot review it.

The reality

Attaching a GPS device to a person is a Fourth Amendment search, the Supreme Court held in Grady v. North Carolina — even when the state calls the program civil. That means the monitoring must be reasonable, judged by the totality of the circumstances, and can be challenged on that ground.

What the law says

Grady did not decide whether North Carolina’s lifetime monitoring was reasonable; it sent the case back for that question. Monitoring as a condition of supervision is assessed in light of the person’s reduced expectations of privacy while on supervision.

Statutory GPS programs — such as Massachusetts’s requirement for homeless registrants — are subject to the same principle.

See the lawGrady v. North Carolina, 575 U.S. 306 (2015)

Treatment only matters while you are in prison.

False — under federal law, completed treatment is part of the clean record that shortens registration.
The myth

Sex offender treatment is a prison program that has nothing to do with life after release.

The reality

Treatment often follows people out of prison — as a supervision condition, and as part of how registration can end. SORNA’s clean-record reduction requires successful completion of an appropriate sex offender treatment program certified by a jurisdiction or the Attorney General.

What the law says

The Supreme Court held in McKune v. Lile that a prison treatment program may require participants to disclose past offenses, including uncharged ones, without violating the privilege against self-incrimination, so long as the consequences of refusing are not severe enough to compel.

Some states ask about treatment at registration — Alaska requires a statement about whether the person has had treatment since conviction.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20915(b)(1)(D); McKune v. Lile, 536 U.S. 24 (2002)

Failing to register is just a probation violation.

False — it is a separate crime, often a felony, and can also violate supervision.
The myth

Missing a registration deadline only matters to a probation officer.

The reality

Failing to register or update is a crime of its own, prosecuted separately from any supervision violation. Under federal law it carries up to 10 years in prison; every state punishes it, and many treat it as a felony with mandatory consequences.

What the law says

Florida imposes a mandatory term of community control with electronic monitoring when a court does not send a person convicted of failing to register to prison. Missouri requires electronic monitoring after a third failure-to-register offense. Illinois makes a first violation of its registration act a felony.

For a person on supervision, the same missed deadline can also be a violation of supervision — two proceedings from one mistake.

See the law18 U.S.C. § 2250; Fla. Stat. § 943.0435(9); Mo. Rev. Stat. § 589.425; 730 ILCS 150/10

Federal supervised release can’t last longer than the prison sentence.

False — for many federal sex offenses it is at least five years and can be life.
The myth

Supervision after a federal sentence is always short and always shorter than the time served.

The reality

For many federal sex offenses, including failing to register under SORNA, the authorized term of supervised release is any term of years not less than five, or life — regardless of the prison term.

What the law says

The list in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(k) includes aggravated sexual abuse, sexual exploitation of children, child sexual abuse material offenses, enticement and transportation offenses, and SORNA failure to register. A registrant who commits certain new offenses faces mandatory revocation and at least five years’ imprisonment.

A court can terminate supervised release early after one year if the person’s conduct and the interest of justice warrant it.

See the law18 U.S.C. § 3583(k)

Civil commitment is just a longer prison sentence.

Legally no — it is civil confinement that requires proof of a mental abnormality and serious difficulty with control.
The myth

A state can keep anyone with a sex offense locked up after their sentence simply by calling it civil commitment.

The reality

The Supreme Court has allowed states, and the federal government, to confine some people after their sentences end — but only on proof of a mental abnormality or personality disorder that makes them dangerous, and of serious difficulty controlling their behavior. The Court treats it as civil, not as a second punishment.

What the law says

Kansas v. Hendricks (1997) upheld Kansas’s law; Kansas v. Crane (2002) held it does not require total inability to control behavior but does require serious difficulty; United States v. Comstock (2010) upheld Congress’s power to civilly commit sexually dangerous federal prisoners.

Texas, for example, allows a civilly committed person to live outside a commitment center under strict verification — reporting every 90 days.

See the lawKansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346 (1997); Kansas v. Crane, 534 U.S. 407 (2002); United States v. Comstock, 560 U.S. 126 (2010)

Finishing probation early ends registration early.

Usually not — the registration term runs separately, with a few state exceptions.
The myth

If a judge ends probation early, the registration requirement ends at the same time.

The reality

Early termination of supervision does not normally shorten registration, because the registration term is set by statute. Completing supervision successfully can count toward relief — it is one element of SORNA’s clean-record reduction — but it does not end registration on its own.

What the law says

Arizona is an exception worth knowing: for some young registrants placed on probation, the court holds an annual review hearing at which it can terminate probation and also continue, suspend or terminate registration and community notification.

Check whether your state’s removal petition counts years from conviction, from release, or from the end of supervision — the clock varies.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20915(b)(1)(C); A.R.S. § 13-923

Supervision can never restrict contact with your own children.

They can — but such conditions face closer review because they burden a fundamental right.
The myth

Parents keep unrestricted contact with their own children no matter what the supervision order says.

The reality

Supervision conditions can restrict contact with a person’s own children when the case justifies it. Because the right to family life is fundamental, courts review those conditions closely and statutes often build in parent exceptions.

What the law says

Texas requires the parole panel to bar some paroled registrants from communicating online with minors, but lets it modify that condition for a releasee who is the child’s parent or guardian and is not otherwise prohibited from communicating with them. Federal conditions must involve no greater deprivation of liberty than reasonably necessary.

Statutes can restrict it too: Alabama’s co-residence ban was held by the full Eleventh Circuit in 2026 to burden a fundamental parental right and require strict scrutiny — a ruling that is not yet final.

See the lawTex. Gov’t Code § 508.1861; 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d); Ala. Code § 15-20A-11(d)

04 · Work & business · 18 myths

Can a registrant work, run a business or volunteer?

No federal law bars registrants from working. What exists is a patchwork: state rules about certain places and kinds of work, licensing decisions, employer policies, and a duty to report where you work.

Registrants cannot legally have a job.

False — the law expects registrants to work and requires them to report where.
The myth

People on the registry are prohibited from working.

The reality

Most registrants are legally allowed to work. Some occupations and workplaces are restricted by state law, licensing rules, probation conditions or employer policy, but there is no law that prevents all registrants from being employed.

What the law says

Federal law takes employment for granted: every registrant must give the registry the name and address of any place where they work or will work, and must update it within three business days of a change.

The restrictions that do exist are specific. Alabama, for example, limits employment and volunteering near schools and child care facilities; South Carolina bars some registrants from working for child-oriented businesses. Those rules name places or kinds of work — not work in general.

See the law34 U.S.C. §§ 20913(c), 20914(a)(4)

Employers are legally prohibited from hiring registrants.

False — no general federal law bars hiring; specific jobs and places are restricted.
The myth

Federal law makes it illegal for employers to hire anyone listed on a sex offender registry.

The reality

No general federal law prohibits employers from hiring registrants. Some professions and workplaces are restricted, and many employers run background checks, but hiring decisions are left to employers unless a specific law applies.

What the law says

Background check companies are covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Its seven-year limit on reporting old records does not apply to records of criminal convictions, so a conviction can appear on a report however old it is.

Some state laws put the duty on the applicant rather than the employer — Arizona, for example, requires certain registrants to disclose their conviction when applying for work or volunteering with children.

See the law15 U.S.C. § 1681c(a)(5); A.R.S. § 13-3716

Registrants cannot own a business.

False — ownership is generally legal; some businesses and locations are restricted.
The myth

People on the registry are prohibited from starting or operating a business.

The reality

Most registrants may legally own and operate businesses. Restrictions usually apply to certain licensed professions, businesses serving children, or particular locations — and a self-employed registrant still has to report the work.

What the law says

Federal law defines “employee” to include a person who is self-employed, so a business owner reports the business as their place of employment.

Illinois shows what targeted limits look like: a child sex offender may not operate, manage or be employed by a carnival, amusement enterprise or fair when minors are present. South Carolina bars some registrants from working for a “child-oriented business” — a school, daycare, arcade, trampoline park or ice-cream truck, for example.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20911(12); 720 ILCS 5/11-9.3(c-5)

Registrants cannot obtain professional licenses.

It depends — licensing boards decide case by case unless a statute says otherwise.
The myth

Every professional license is automatically denied to registrants.

The reality

Licensing laws differ by profession and state. Some licenses or endorsements are barred by statute, some boards review the applicant’s history and rehabilitation individually, and many licenses have nothing to do with registry status.

What the law says

Statutory bars tend to be specific. North Carolina will not issue a commercial driver’s license with a passenger or school-bus endorsement to a registrant, but the statute does not bar the license itself.

Some federal conviction-based bars are time-limited: a rape conviction bars serving as a union officer, or in the other union and benefit-plan positions the statute lists, for 13 years after conviction or release from prison, unless the sentencing court sets a shorter period. Check the specific board’s statute and rules before assuming a bar exists.

See the lawN.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-208.19A; 29 U.S.C. § 504

Registrants cannot volunteer anywhere.

False — most volunteering is legal; roles with children are often restricted or must be disclosed.
The myth

People on the registry are legally prohibited from all volunteer work.

The reality

There is no nationwide prohibition on volunteering. Certain volunteer positions, especially those involving children or vulnerable people, are restricted by law or organizational policy — and unpaid work can still count as employment that must be reported.

What the law says

SORNA’s definition of “employee” covers anyone who works for an entity “whether compensated or not.”

Examples of state rules: Ohio limits volunteer positions with extensive contact with minors; North Carolina bars some registrants from working or volunteering with minors; Arizona requires disclosure when volunteering with children; Mississippi requires notice when volunteering.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20911(12); Ohio Rev. Code § 2950.035

Background checks always disqualify registrants.

False — a check reports information; the employer decides, within the law.
The myth

A background check automatically means a registrant cannot be hired.

The reality

Background checks give employers information, but hiring decisions depend on employer policy, the law that applies to the position, the job itself and the applicant’s qualifications and history.

What the law says

A consumer report may include records of criminal convictions however old they are; the seven-year limit applies to arrests and other items, not convictions.

If a report is wrong — someone else’s record, a dismissed charge shown as a conviction, an outdated registry status — the Fair Credit Reporting Act gives the applicant the right to dispute it with the background check company, which must investigate.

See the law15 U.S.C. §§ 1681c(a)(5), 1681i

Registrants cannot work from home.

False — remote work is legal; home child care is the common exception.
The myth

Registry status makes remote or home-based employment illegal.

The reality

Most registrants may legally work from home. Limits usually come from the nature of the job, supervision conditions or a specific court order — not from registration itself. The employer’s name and address still have to be reported.

What the law says

The common statutory exception is running child care from home: North Carolina bars some registrants from providing child care in their residence, alongside its ban on working or volunteering with minors.

If the job involves internet accounts used for work, check whether your state requires those identifiers to be reported as well.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20914(a)(4); N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-208.17

Self-employment avoids all registry rules.

False — federal law counts self-employment as employment.
The myth

Starting your own business eliminates registration obligations.

The reality

Running your own business does not remove registration or reporting requirements. A self-employed registrant must still report the work and keep it current, and must still comply with every other law that applies.

What the law says

SORNA says the term “employee” includes an individual who is self-employed. The registry must include the name and address of any place of employment, and changes must be reported within three business days.

State statutes say the same in their own words — Michigan, for example, requires reporting of changes in employment, and many states require the address where the work is done if it differs from the business address.

See the law34 U.S.C. §§ 20911(12), 20913(c)

Registrants cannot get a commercial driver’s license.

Generally yes — some states bar the passenger and school-bus endorsements.
The myth

Trade certifications such as a commercial driver’s license are automatically denied to everyone on the registry.

The reality

Eligibility for certifications varies by state, licensing authority and profession. A commercial driver’s license is generally available, but some states bar the endorsements needed to carry passengers or drive a school bus.

What the law says

North Carolina, for example, will not issue or renew a commercial driver’s license with a P (passenger) or S (school bus) endorsement — or a learner’s permit with either — to anyone required to register. The license itself is not barred.

Employers and platforms make their own decisions: trucking companies, transit agencies and ride-share platforms set background-check policies that are often stricter than the law.

See the lawN.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-208.19A

Every employer checks the registry.

False — practices vary widely by industry and employer.
The myth

All employers search sex offender registries before hiring.

The reality

Many employers run background checks, but not every employer searches registry databases. Hiring practices vary widely by industry, organization and the law that applies to the position.

What the law says

Anyone can search the national public website for free. Employers that use a background check company are covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which governs what the report may contain.

Where a law requires a check — child care, schools, some health care roles — the check is required for that position, not for all employers.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20922; 15 U.S.C. § 1681c

Registrants cannot start an online business.

False — legal, but the business and its online identifiers may need to be reported.
The myth

Operating an internet-based business is illegal for registrants.

The reality

Most registrants may own and operate online businesses. Restrictions depend on supervision conditions or the nature of the business. Running it is self-employment that must be reported, and any online identifiers it uses may be too.

What the law says

Florida requires each internet identifier to be reported together with the website or application it belongs to — which can include the accounts a business uses.

A business that involves contact with minors raises separate questions under the state’s employment and presence rules.

See the law34 U.S.C. §§ 20911(12), 20916; Fla. Stat. § 943.0435(14)

Registrants can’t belong to a union.

Membership is not barred — but some convictions bar union office for up to 13 years.
The myth

Starting a company, joining a union or holding a leadership role is prohibited because of registry status.

The reality

Many registrants legally build and run businesses and belong to unions. Registry status is not a bar. Federal labor law does bar people convicted of certain crimes — including rape — from serving as union officers and in other listed union and benefit-plan positions for a period after the conviction.

What the law says

The bar lasts 13 years after conviction or the end of imprisonment, whichever is later, unless the sentencing court sets a shorter period of at least three years. It turns on the crime of conviction, not on registration — many registrable offenses are not on the list.

It does not affect union membership itself.

See the law29 U.S.C. § 504

Registrants cannot work night shifts.

False — work rules are about places and kinds of work, not hours.
The myth

Employment during overnight hours is prohibited for people on the registry.

The reality

There is no law restricting registrants’ work by time of day. Employment limits relate to the kind of work, the location, or supervision conditions — such as a curfew.

What the law says

Alabama and Georgia restrict employment within set distances of schools and child care; Illinois restricts carnival and fair work when minors are present. None of these depends on the hour.

A curfew in a probation order is the usual reason night work becomes a problem — and many officers will approve work hours in writing.

See the lawAla. Code § 15-20A-13; O.C.G.A. § 42-1-15(c)

Registrants cannot receive promotions.

False — but a new role or work site can bring new rules and reporting.
The myth

An employer is legally prohibited from promoting an employee who is on the registry.

The reality

No law prevents a promotion based on registry status. Promotions follow employer policy, qualifications and any job-specific legal restrictions. A new role can matter if it moves the person into restricted work or to a different site.

What the law says

If a promotion changes the place of employment, the change must be reported within three business days. If it moves the person into a role covered by a state rule — supervising minors, or working within a restricted distance of a school, as under Alabama’s employment law — that rule applies.

Recognition and awards at work are, likewise, the employer’s decision.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20913(c); Ala. Code § 15-20A-13

Gig and contract work doesn’t count as employment.

False — federal law counts self-employed and unpaid work; gig work is reportable.
The myth

Independent contracting, day labor and app-based gig work are outside the registry’s reporting rules.

The reality

Most registrants may legally work as independent contractors, depending on licensing and the services involved. But the work is employment for registration purposes and has to be reported like any other job.

What the law says

SORNA defines “employee” to include an individual who is self-employed or works for any other entity, whether compensated or not. Alabama’s registration statute expressly asks for transient or day-laborer information along with the employer’s name and address.

Gig platforms run their own background checks and set their own eligibility rules, which can be stricter than the law.

See the law34 U.S.C. §§ 20911(12), 20914(a)(4); Ala. Code § 15-20A-7

Registrants always have to tell their employer they’re on the registry.

Not as a general rule — some states require disclosure for specific kinds of work.
The myth

Every employee on the registry must announce it at work, or the employer is breaking the law by keeping them.

The reality

There is no general duty to tell an employer about registration. The registrant reports the employer to the registry, not the other way round. Some states require disclosure when applying for particular kinds of work or volunteering.

What the law says

Arizona requires certain registrants to disclose their conviction when applying for work or volunteering with children; Mississippi requires notice when volunteering. Federal law allows states to leave the employer’s name off the public website.

Employers may ask on applications and may learn of it through background checks — but recognizing an employee’s work, with awards or otherwise, is entirely their decision.

See the lawA.R.S. § 13-3716; 34 U.S.C. § 20920(c)(2)

Registrants cannot build successful careers.

False — the barriers are real, but no law forbids a career.
The myth

Meaningful employment is impossible for anyone on the registry.

The reality

Many registrants face real employment barriers, and many also build stable careers, run businesses, earn professional credentials where permitted, and become productive members of their communities. No law makes a career impossible.

What the law says

The law assumes registrants work — it requires them to report where — and lets states keep employer names off the public website, which can reduce one practical barrier.

Knowing which rules actually apply — and which are myths — is often the first step: the restrictions are narrower than most people assume.

See the law34 U.S.C. §§ 20914(a)(4), 20920(c)(2)

Only jobs working with children are ever restricted.

Not just child-care jobs — some states restrict by location, industry or license.
The myth

As long as a job doesn’t involve working directly with kids, no employment rule can apply.

The reality

Many restrictions do center on children, but not all of them are about working with children directly. Some states restrict work by location, some by industry, and some by license endorsement.

What the law says

Alabama and Georgia restrict employment within set distances of schools and child care facilities, whatever the job. Illinois bars child sex offenders from working at carnivals and fairs when minors are present. South Carolina bars work for child-oriented businesses — which includes ice-cream trucks. North Carolina bars the commercial-license endorsements needed to drive buses.

Supervision conditions may add their own employment rules, such as approval of each job by the officer.

See the lawAla. Code § 15-20A-13; O.C.G.A. § 42-1-15(c); S.C. Code Ann. § 23-3-538

05 · Housing · 11 myths

Where can a registrant live, rent or own property?

Where a registrant may live depends on state distance rules, local ordinances, landlord policies and, for federally assisted housing, one federal statute. Owning property and living in it are treated differently.

Registrants cannot rent an apartment.

False in general — but landlords may screen, and federally assisted housing has a lifetime-registrant bar.
The myth

Being on the registry automatically makes it illegal to rent or lease a home or apartment.

The reality

In most states there is no law that prohibits registrants from renting. Individual landlords and property managers may screen applicants, local residency rules may rule out particular addresses, and one federal statute bars lifetime registrants from federally assisted housing.

What the law says

The federal rule is narrow and specific: an owner of federally assisted housing must deny admission to any household that includes a person subject to a lifetime registration requirement under a state program. HUD’s regulations apply the same bar to public housing and the Housing Choice Voucher program.

Private landlords set their own screening policies. Where a state or city has distance rules, the question is whether that particular address is allowed — not whether renting is.

See the law42 U.S.C. § 13663; 24 C.F.R. §§ 960.204, 982.553

Residency restrictions exist everywhere.

False — there is no federal residency rule, and state and local rules vary from none to 2,000 feet.
The myth

Every city and state prohibits registrants from living near schools or parks.

The reality

Residency restrictions vary significantly. Some states impose statewide distance rules, some leave them to local governments, and others have few or none. Federal law says nothing about where a registrant may live. Always check the law where the residence is located.

What the law says

Examples of statewide rules: Alabama 2,000 feet; Ohio and North Carolina 1,000 feet from schools and child care; Delaware 500 feet from schools; North Dakota 500 feet for high-risk offenders. Iowa’s rule applies to defined categories of offenders, not to everyone. Cities and counties in many states add their own ordinances.

Courts have gone both ways. Doe v. Miller upheld Iowa’s 2,000-foot rule; In re Taylor held blanket enforcement of California’s rule on San Diego parolees unconstitutional; Kentucky’s high court held its restrictions could not reach people whose offenses came first.

See the lawAla. Code § 15-20A-11; Ohio Rev. Code § 2950.034; N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-208.16

Buying a home is illegal for registrants.

False — buying property is legal; living there must meet any distance rule.
The myth

People on the registry cannot legally purchase real estate.

The reality

No general law prevents registrants from buying or owning property. Residency restrictions, local ordinances and homeowners’ association rules may affect whether they can live at a particular address.

What the law says

Some statutes protect existing owners explicitly. Oklahoma’s residency law says nothing in it requires a person to sell or dispose of real estate acquired or owned before the conviction. Arkansas exempts an offender living on property owned before the dates its restrictions took effect.

Before buying, check the distance rules for that address — under state law and any city or county ordinance — and any supervision conditions about where you may live.

See the law57 O.S. § 590; Ark. Code § 5-14-128(c)

Registrants are homeless because the law requires it.

False — no law requires it, though distance rules can leave few legal addresses.
The myth

The law intentionally forces registrants to become homeless.

The reality

No law requires homelessness. Residency restrictions can make housing hard to find in some places, and courts have recognized that. Homeless registrants must still register — usually more often than everyone else.

What the law says

In In re Taylor (2015) the California Supreme Court held that blanket enforcement of a 2,000-foot rule on San Diego parolees was unconstitutional because it drove homelessness without advancing child safety.

Reporting for registrants without a fixed address is stricter: Alabama requires weekly in-person reports; California and Arkansas every 30 days; Arizona at least every 90 days. Massachusetts requires a homeless registrant to wear a GPS device.

See the lawIn re Taylor, 60 Cal.4th 1019 (2015); Ala. Code § 15-20A-12; Cal. Penal Code § 290.011

Hotels cannot rent rooms to registrants.

False — hotels may rent to registrants; longer stays can create a reporting duty.
The myth

It is illegal for hotels or motels to rent rooms to registered sex offenders.

The reality

There is generally no law barring hotels from renting rooms to registrants. Individual businesses may set their own policies, and a long enough stay can count as temporary lodging that the registrant must report.

What the law says

Idaho, Louisiana and Rhode Island all treat a stay of seven days or more away from home as temporary lodging that has to be reported, with the address and dates. Iowa has its own temporary-lodging rule.

The duty to report falls on the registrant, not the hotel.

See the lawIdaho Code § 18-8323; La. R.S. 15:542(C)(1)(n); R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-37.1-3(e)(20)

Registrants cannot stay with family members.

Usually yes — distance rules, minors in the home and supervision can change that.
The myth

It is illegal for family members to allow a registrant to live with them.

The reality

Many registrants live with relatives. Residency rules apply to the family home just as to any other address, and lease terms, supervision conditions or the presence of minors can affect a particular household.

What the law says

Alabama bars an adult registrant from living with, or staying overnight with, a minor — with exceptions for parents, grandparents, stepparents and siblings unless a listed condition applies. Tennessee bars some registrants whose victim was a minor from residing with a minor.

The family member is not committing a crime by having the registrant stay. The registrant is responsible for reporting the address and complying with any rule that applies to it.

See the lawAla. Code § 15-20A-11(d); Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-39-211(c)

A registrant must disclose their status to every neighbor.

Usually not — notification is done by the government, with Louisiana a notable exception.
The myth

The law requires registrants to personally notify nearby residents where they live.

The reality

In most jurisdictions the government, not the registrant, handles community notification — through the public website and, in some states, flyers or mailings to nearby residents. A few states do put the duty on the registrant.

What the law says

Federal law sets up a community notification program run by the jurisdictions. Alabama, for example, has law enforcement notify residents within a set distance of the registrant’s home.

Louisiana is the notable exception: its statute requires the offender to mail notice of the crime, their name, description and address to people living within a designated area within 21 days of release or of moving in.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20923; Ala. Code § 15-20A-21; La. R.S. 15:542.1(A)

Registrants cannot live in rural areas.

False — distance rules depend on what is nearby, not on whether an area is rural.
The myth

Residency restrictions make it illegal for registrants to live in the countryside.

The reality

Many registrants live in rural communities. Residency restrictions, where they exist, are measured from specific places — schools, child care facilities, parks — not from how urban an area is. Rural addresses often have fewer of those places nearby.

What the law says

Some rules reach rural places specifically: North Dakota restricts moderate- and high-risk offenders in state parks, and Arkansas includes public parks and youth centers among the places its residence rule measures from.

Rural addresses can complicate registration itself — Florida requires a rural route address where that is the address.

See the lawN.D. Cent. Code § 12.1-32-15(18); Ark. Code § 5-14-128

Registrants cannot own rental property.

False — owning property is legal; distance rules govern where you live, not what you own.
The myth

People on the registry are prohibited from purchasing or managing rental real estate.

The reality

Most registrants may legally own investment or rental property. Residency rules control where a registrant lives, not what they own. Restrictions, if any, come from business licensing, supervision conditions or local law.

What the law says

Oklahoma’s residency statute states that nothing in it requires a person to sell or dispose of real estate owned before the conviction, and Arkansas exempts registrants living on property owned before its restrictions took effect.

Managing a property is work like any other: if it is a job or a business, it is reportable employment.

See the law57 O.S. § 590; 34 U.S.C. § 20911(12)

Public housing is open to every registrant.

Not lifetime registrants — federal law bars them from federally assisted housing.
The myth

Because most registrants can rent anywhere, federally assisted housing and vouchers work the same as any apartment.

The reality

Most registrants may rent private apartments, subject to state and local rules and landlord policy. Federally assisted housing is different: federal law requires owners to deny admission to any household with a member subject to a lifetime registration requirement under a state program.

What the law says

HUD’s regulations apply the bar to public housing and the Housing Choice Voucher (Section 8) program, and require the housing agency to run criminal history background checks during screening — in the state where the housing is and in other states where household members are known to have lived.

The rule turns on a lifetime registration requirement. A registrant with a term of years is not covered by this federal bar, though housing agencies may consider criminal history under their own admission policies.

See the law42 U.S.C. § 13663; 24 C.F.R. §§ 960.204(a)(4), 982.553(a)(2)(i)

Owning your home exempts you from residency restrictions.

Sometimes — many statutes protect a residence established before a date, but not ownership alone.
The myth

Once a registrant owns a home, residency restrictions can never apply to it — or, the reverse, a registrant can never become a homeowner.

The reality

Registrants may buy homes, and many states protect a residence that was established before the law, or before a school or child care center opened nearby. But the protection depends on the statute’s wording and dates — ownership alone does not exempt a home, and moving can end the protection.

What the law says

Iowa exempts residences established before July 1, 2002, or before a new school or child care facility opened. North Carolina’s rule applies to registrants who did not establish the residence before August 16, 2006. Nebraska exempts a residence established before July 1, 2006 if the person has not moved. Arkansas protects residence on property owned before set dates.

Kentucky’s highest court held that its residency restrictions could not be applied to people whose offenses came before the restrictions were enacted.

See the lawIowa Code § 692A.114; N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-208.16; Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-4017

06 · Travel · 12 myths

Can a registrant travel — across a state line or out of the country?

Travel is generally lawful. What changes is the reporting: short stays can trigger temporary-lodging rules, working or studying elsewhere can mean registering there, and every international trip needs advance notice.

Registrants cannot leave their state.

False — interstate travel is lawful; moving, working or studying elsewhere brings reporting duties.
The myth

Once someone is on the registry, they are legally prohibited from traveling outside their home state.

The reality

Most registrants may travel within the United States. Depending on state law, supervision status and the length of the trip, they may have to notify authorities or register temporarily in another jurisdiction. Being on the registry does not create a blanket ban on interstate travel.

What the law says

Federal law requires registration where a person lives, works or studies, with updates within three business days of a change. The federal crime is not traveling — it is traveling interstate and then knowingly failing to register or update as required.

States add their own notice rules. Florida, for instance, requires a registrant who plans to establish a residence in another state to report in person at least 48 hours before leaving. Supervision conditions — permission from a probation officer, for example — are a separate layer.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20913; 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a)

Registrants cannot get a passport.

Mostly false — registrants can get passports, but some must carry a unique identifier.
The myth

Being on the registry automatically prevents someone from obtaining or renewing a U.S. passport.

The reality

Most registrants remain eligible for a passport. Under International Megan’s Law, though, the State Department may not issue a passport to a “covered sex offender” — a person currently required to register on the basis of an offense against a minor — unless it carries a unique identifier, and it may revoke one issued without it.

What the law says

The identifier is a visual designation in a conspicuous place on the passport book or card. It is triggered by a written determination from the Angel Watch Center, and it comes off when Angel Watch determines the person is no longer required to register.

Separately, every registrant must report intended international travel at least 21 days before departure. A passport is permission from the United States to travel; whether the destination country lets the traveler in is that country’s decision.

See the law22 U.S.C. § 212b; 34 U.S.C. § 21503(f); 28 C.F.R. § 72.7(f)

Registrants can never travel internationally.

False — many do, after 21 days’ notice; some countries refuse entry.
The myth

People on the registry are permanently banned from leaving the United States.

The reality

Many registrants legally travel abroad. U.S. law requires every registrant to report intended international travel at least 21 days in advance, the U.S. government may notify the destination country, and some countries deny entry. Admission is always the destination country’s decision.

What the law says

The 21-day notice goes to the registrant’s residence jurisdiction and includes dates, carrier and flight numbers, destination and purpose. Under International Megan’s Law the Angel Watch Center and the U.S. Marshals Service may transmit information about the trip to the destination country.

Leaving out the notice is a federal crime carrying up to 10 years in prison. Many states have their own 21-day rules too — South Dakota, North Dakota and Kansas among them. Supervision conditions often require separate permission.

See the law28 C.F.R. § 72.7(f); 34 U.S.C. §§ 20914(a)(7), 21503, 21504; 18 U.S.C. § 2250(b)

Registrants must notify every state before entering.

Usually not for a short visit — but stays, regular visits and every trip abroad carry rules.
The myth

Crossing a state line always requires advance notification to law enforcement.

The reality

Notice rules vary by state and usually depend on how long the person stays or how often they return. Many states require registration only after a visitor stays past a set period. International travel is different: every trip outside the U.S. needs notice at least 21 days in advance.

What the law says

Examples: Texas requires registration by people who regularly visit a location; Connecticut covers nonresident workers, students and recurring visitors; Illinois requires a registrant temporarily away from home for three or more days to notify their home agency with an itinerary. Louisiana requires temporary-lodging information for stays of seven days or more — and for international travel, however short.

The visited state’s rule and the home state’s rule can both apply to the same trip.

See the lawTex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 62.059; Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-253(c); 28 C.F.R. § 72.7(f)

A short trip never has to be reported.

Not always safe to assume — several states set the line at three or seven days, and trips abroad always count.
The myth

As long as a trip is only a few days, there is nothing to tell the registering agency.

The reality

Most registrants may take a vacation, but how long is too long to stay silent depends on the state. Some states require notice of an absence of three days or more; several treat seven days away as temporary lodging that must be reported. Any trip outside the U.S., however short, needs 21 days’ notice.

What the law says

Illinois requires a registrant temporarily away from their registered address for three or more days to notify their agency with the itinerary. Alaska requires reporting of temporary lodging used for seven days or more; Louisiana and Rhode Island set seven days too. Mississippi presumes a duty to update after seven aggregate days away in a six-month period.

Supervision conditions can be stricter than any of these — many require permission for any overnight stay outside the county.

See the law730 ILCS 150/3(a); Alaska Stat. § 12.63.010; 28 C.F.R. § 72.7(f)

A cruise doesn’t count as international travel.

False — a cruise to foreign ports is international travel with 21 days’ notice.
The myth

Because a cruise leaves from and returns to a U.S. port, it does not need the international travel notice.

The reality

A cruise that calls at foreign ports is travel outside the United States. Federal rules require notice of intended international travel at least 21 days in advance, with itinerary details, and the U.S. government may tell the countries on the route that a registrant is coming.

What the law says

The information a registrant must provide about international travel includes dates and places of departure, arrival and return, the carrier, and the destination country and address — for a cruise, every port of call. Louisiana requires temporary-lodging information for international travel regardless of how many nights it lasts.

Countries decide whether to let a passenger ashore. Some deny entry to registrants, which can mean staying on board at that port. Cruise lines set their own policies too, and they are not the same as the law.

See the law28 C.F.R. § 72.7(f); 34 U.S.C. §§ 20914(a)(7), 21503

Working in another state doesn’t mean registering there.

Often yes — federal law requires registration where you work, and states set thresholds.
The myth

Business travel or a job across the state line only needs to be reported at home.

The reality

Business travel is generally permitted, but working somewhere is one of the three things that trigger registration under federal law — alongside living and studying there. Many states require nonresident workers to register after a set period.

What the law says

SORNA requires registration in each jurisdiction where the offender is an employee. Colorado treats someone employed in the state for more than 14 consecutive business days, paid or not, as a temporary resident who must register; Connecticut covers nonresident workers and students; New Mexico has its own nonresident-worker rule. North Carolina requires registration in another county for out-of-county work with a temporary residence.

Short business trips are usually handled by the travel and temporary-lodging rules instead.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20913(a); C.R.S. § 16-22-102(8); Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-253(c)

Registrants cannot stay with friends while traveling.

Generally yes — but repeated or longer stays can count as a place you live.
The myth

It is illegal for registrants to stay overnight at a friend’s home.

The reality

Most registrants may stay with friends, but temporary-lodging or residence rules can apply depending on the state and how long or how often they stay. Some states also restrict overnight stays where minors live.

What the law says

Federal law defines “resides” as where a person habitually lives. Idaho defines “habitually lives” to include any place visited for more than five hours, more than five times in 30 days. Indiana treats spending more than three nights in 30 days at a place as residing there for its residency restrictions.

Alabama bars an adult registrant from an overnight visit with a minor, with family exceptions.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20911(13); Idaho Code § 18-8303(8); IC 35-42-4-11

Registrants cannot obtain a driver's license.

False — licenses are available; several states mark them.
The myth

Registry status automatically prevents someone from receiving or renewing a driver’s license.

The reality

Driver’s licenses are available to registrants who otherwise qualify under state law. What several states do is mark the license or ID, require it to be renewed more often, or tie its renewal to registration.

What the law says

Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Tennessee, Kansas, Arkansas and Mississippi all have statutes requiring a designation on the license or ID for some or all registrants. Louisiana’s license must say “sex offender.” Florida requires registrants to report to a driver license office after address and name changes.

Commercial licenses are a separate question — North Carolina bars the passenger and school-bus endorsements.

See the lawAla. Code § 15-20A-18; Fla. Stat. § 322.141(3); La. R.S. 32:412(I); Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-39-213

Crossing a state line is a crime for registrants.

False — travel is lawful; the crime is traveling and then knowingly failing to register.
The myth

Traveling into another state automatically violates the law.

The reality

Interstate travel is lawful. Federal law makes it a crime for a person required to register who travels interstate or abroad to knowingly fail to register or update a registration as required. States require registration or notice after a person stays a set time or starts living, working or studying there.

What the law says

The penalty is up to 10 years in prison. Knowingly failing to report intended international travel is its own federal offense. There is an affirmative defense when uncontrollable circumstances prevented compliance, the person did not recklessly create them, and the person complied as soon as they ended.

The Supreme Court held in Carr that the interstate travel must come after SORNA took effect. In Nichols it held that SORNA as then written did not require reporting a move abroad — Congress has since changed that.

See the law18 U.S.C. § 2250(a)–(c)

Registrants cannot stay in campgrounds.

Generally yes — some states restrict state parks, and long stays count as temporary lodging.
The myth

Camping is illegal for people on the registry.

The reality

Most registrants may stay at campgrounds unless a specific law, supervision condition or campground policy says otherwise. A long stay can count as temporary lodging that must be reported.

What the law says

North Dakota restricts moderate- and high-risk offenders in state parks. Oklahoma’s residency statute includes campsites used by organizations whose primary purpose is working with children. Idaho treats seven or more days away from home as temporary lodging to be reported.

Youth camps and campgrounds run by organizations for children are the places most often restricted.

See the lawN.D. Cent. Code § 12.1-32-15(18); 57 O.S. § 590; Idaho Code § 18-8323

Registrants cannot travel by airplane.

False — no law bars domestic flights; international flights need 21 days’ notice.
The myth

Being listed on a registry automatically prohibits commercial air travel.

The reality

Most registrants may legally travel by air. No federal law bars registrants from domestic flights. International flights are where the rules are: 21 days’ notice with carrier and flight numbers, and a passport that may carry an identifier.

What the law says

The federal registration law lists the travel information a registrant must give — and it is all about travel outside the United States: dates, places of departure and arrival, carrier and flight numbers, destination and purpose.

Domestic trips still bring the ordinary rules — temporary lodging, visits, supervision permission — at the destination and at home.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20914(a)(7); 28 C.F.R. § 72.7(f); 22 U.S.C. § 212b

07 · Internet & phones · 11 myths

Can a registrant go online, own a phone or use social media?

There is no general internet ban for registrants, and the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the broadest one a state tried. What remains is reporting of online identifiers, targeted state laws and supervision conditions.

Registrants are automatically banned from using the Internet.

False — there is no general ban, and the Supreme Court struck down the broadest one.
The myth

Anyone on the sex offender registry is legally prohibited from using the Internet or owning a smartphone.

The reality

Most registrants may legally use the internet. Internet restrictions typically come from probation, parole, supervised release or a specific court order. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that a state law barring registrants from social media sites violated the First Amendment.

What the law says

In Packingham v. North Carolina (2017) the Court called the internet “the modern public square” and struck down a statute that barred registrants — including people who had finished their sentences — from commercial social networking sites.

What registration usually requires instead is reporting: federal law directs the Attorney General to require registrants to provide their internet identifiers, and many states require them by statute. Federal supervised-release conditions must be reasonably related to the case and involve no greater deprivation of liberty than reasonably necessary.

See the lawPackingham v. North Carolina, 582 U.S. 98 (2017); 34 U.S.C. § 20916; 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d)

Owning a smartphone is illegal for registrants.

False — phones are legal; some states require the number, and supervision can limit use.
The myth

Registry status alone makes it illegal to own or use a smartphone.

The reality

Most registrants may legally own smartphones. Restrictions generally come from probation, parole, supervised release or a specific court order. What some states do require is that phone numbers be reported to the registry.

What the law says

Alabama’s registration statute, for example, lists telephone numbers among the information a registrant must provide, alongside online identifiers and internet service providers.

A federal supervision condition limiting devices must be reasonably related to the offense and history and involve no greater deprivation of liberty than reasonably necessary — a court sets it for a person, not for the registry as a whole.

See the lawAla. Code § 15-20A-7; 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d)

Registrants cannot have social media accounts.

False — Packingham struck down a blanket ban; reporting and supervision rules still apply.
The myth

Federal law prohibits everyone on the registry from using Facebook, Instagram, X or similar platforms.

The reality

There is no nationwide social media ban for registrants. In Packingham v. North Carolina the Supreme Court struck down a state law that barred registrants from social networking sites. Restrictions usually come from supervision or a court order, and many states require registrants to report the accounts they use.

What the law says

Florida requires every email address and internet identifier, with each one’s website or app, to be reported; Alabama requires online identifiers and internet service providers. Louisiana goes further and requires certain registrants to disclose their status on networking-site profiles.

Platforms also set their own rules. A platform’s terms of service are not law, but breaking them can get an account closed — and some supervision conditions incorporate them.

See the lawPackingham v. North Carolina, 582 U.S. 98 (2017); 34 U.S.C. § 20916

Police monitor every online activity of registrants.

False — registries collect identifiers; monitoring software is a supervision condition.
The myth

Law enforcement continuously watches everything every registrant does online.

The reality

Some people under supervision have monitoring conditions, but registrants who have finished supervision are not under constant online monitoring because they are registered. What registration usually involves is handing over the identifiers they use.

What the law says

Federal law directs the Attorney General to require registrants to provide their internet identifiers, and those records are covered by the Privacy Act.

Courts have limited how far reporting can go. In Doe v. Harris the Ninth Circuit held that California’s requirement to report every online identifier within 24 hours likely violated the First Amendment.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20916; Doe v. Harris, 772 F.3d 563 (9th Cir. 2014)

Registrants cannot own a computer.

False — owning a computer is legal; device limits are supervision conditions.
The myth

Registry status alone makes computer ownership illegal.

The reality

Most registrants may legally own and use computers. Device and internet restrictions are imposed as conditions of supervision or by specific court orders, not by registration itself.

What the law says

A federal court that imposes a computer condition on supervised release must tie it to the case and keep it no broader than reasonably necessary. Nevada’s statute lists internet-access conditions among those its courts may impose on probation for sex offenses.

After supervision ends, those conditions end with it; what may continue is a statutory duty to report online identifiers.

See the law18 U.S.C. § 3583(d); Nev. Rev. Stat. § 176A.410(1)(q)

Registrants cannot have email accounts.

False — email is legal; many states require the address to be reported.
The myth

Registry status makes it illegal to create or use an email address.

The reality

Most registrants may legally use email. Many states require email addresses and other internet identifiers to be reported, and people under supervision may have additional conditions.

What the law says

Alaska requires email, messaging and other internet identifiers; California requires a report when internet identifiers change; Florida requires every email address and identifier.

Courts have checked the most burdensome versions. The Ninth Circuit held that California’s requirement to report every new identifier within 24 hours likely violated the First Amendment.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20916; Alaska Stat. § 12.63.010(b)(1)(I); Cal. Penal Code § 290.014

Using online banking is prohibited.

False — banking online is legal unless a court order or supervision says otherwise.
The myth

Registrants cannot legally access online banking or financial websites.

The reality

Most registrants may use online banking and other financial services. Internet restrictions arise only through supervision conditions or court orders, and even those are usually written to allow necessary services.

What the law says

Federal supervision conditions must involve no greater deprivation of liberty than reasonably necessary, which is why computer conditions are commonly written with exceptions for work, banking and similar uses.

Online retirement, investment and payment accounts are treated the same way.

See the law18 U.S.C. § 3583(d)

New usernames don’t have to be reported.

In many states, yes — online identifiers are registration information with deadlines.
The myth

Shopping, posting or signing up for a new site online is nobody’s business but the registrant’s.

The reality

Most registrants may shop online and use the internet freely. But in many states a new email address, username or other online identifier is registration information that has to be reported within a set time — and leaving it out can be a crime.

What the law says

Federal law directs the Attorney General to require registrants to provide their internet identifiers. North Carolina requires reporting a change of online identifier; Arizona requires reporting changes of online identifier along with name and vehicle changes; California requires a report when identifiers change; Colorado requires online identifiers from people registered for child sex crimes.

Courts have struck down the most burdensome versions — in Doe v. Harris the Ninth Circuit found a 24-hour reporting rule likely unconstitutional — so check your own state’s current rule and deadline.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20916; N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-208.9; A.R.S. § 13-3822

There are no limits on contacting minors online after Packingham.

False — targeted bans on online contact with minors survive Packingham.
The myth

Video calls, messaging and chat with anyone, of any age, are protected because the Supreme Court struck down the social media ban.

The reality

Video calls and messaging are legal for most registrants, unless a court or supervision condition restricts them. But Packingham left room for narrowly tailored laws aimed at conduct that often comes before a sexual crime — such as contacting a minor — and some states have them.

What the law says

Illinois makes it a felony for a child sex offender to communicate online with a person under 18, or someone believed to be under 18, other than for a lawful purpose — unless the offender is the minor’s parent or guardian.

South Carolina lets a judge bar a registrant from using the internet to communicate with minors, with room to permit contact with the registrant’s own child or grandchild. Texas requires similar parole conditions for some registrants, which the parole panel may modify for a parent not otherwise barred from contact.

See the law720 ILCS 5/11-9.3(b-20); S.C. Code Ann. § 23-3-555; Packingham v. North Carolina, 582 U.S. 98 (2017)

Registrants cannot own a website.

False — legal, though accounts tied to it may have to be reported.
The myth

Creating or operating a personal or business website is prohibited.

The reality

Most registrants may own and manage websites unless a specific supervision condition or court order limits internet activity. Speaking and publishing online is protected by the First Amendment like any other speech.

What the law says

Where identifiers must be reported, the accounts used to run a site may count. Florida asks for each internet identifier together with its website homepage or application.

Louisiana requires certain registrants who create a profile on a networking site to show their status on it — an example of how state law can attach conditions without banning the activity.

See the lawFla. Stat. § 943.0435(14); La. R.S. 15:542.1(D)

After Packingham, courts can’t limit a registrant’s internet use at all.

Yes — Packingham struck a blanket law, not every restriction.
The myth

Because the Supreme Court protected internet access, no one can restrict a registrant’s online banking, investing or any other internet use.

The reality

Most registrants may use banking, retirement, investment and financial services online, and the Supreme Court has protected internet access. But Packingham struck down a blanket statute that applied to people who had finished their sentences. Courts still impose tailored internet conditions on people under supervision.

What the law says

The Court said states may enact specific, narrowly tailored laws against conduct that often precedes a sexual crime, and stressed that North Carolina’s law burdened people no longer under supervision.

Federal supervised-release conditions remain lawful if they are reasonably related to the case and involve no greater deprivation of liberty than reasonably necessary — that is the test a challenge has to meet.

See the lawPackingham v. North Carolina, 582 U.S. 98 (2017); 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d)

08 · Schools & child-focused places · 8 myths

Can a registrant go to a school, a park or a polling place inside a school?

Presence rules are among the most state-specific laws on this site. Many states that limit school presence also write exceptions — for voting, for parents dropping off a child, for conferences, or with written permission.

Registrants can never attend their own child's school events.

It depends on the state — many presence laws have written exceptions for parents.
The myth

A person on the registry is automatically barred from every school function involving their child.

The reality

This is not universally true. Whether a registrant may attend school events depends on state law, school district policy, court orders, supervision conditions and the circumstances. Some states write exceptions for parents into the statute; some schools allow attendance with prior approval; others restrict it.

What the law says

Examples of the exceptions: Florida’s school-presence law does not apply to a parent or grandparent who is only dropping off or picking up a child. Wisconsin lets a registrant on school premises once the school has been notified of the date, time and place of the visit, and separately exempts a parent of an enrolled child who notifies the district administrator. Idaho’s allows presence with written permission obtained from the district before the first visit of the school year.

Other states draw tighter lines, and a supervision condition can forbid what the statute allows. Read your own state’s text, and the conditions of any supervision, before you go.

See the lawFla. Stat. § 856.022; Wis. Stat. § 301.475; Idaho Code § 18-8329

Registrants can never attend parent-teacher conferences.

Often yes — several states write conferences or parent notice into the statute.
The myth

Parents on the registry are automatically banned from all meetings at their child’s school.

The reality

School access depends on state law, school policy and any supervision conditions. Some states expressly allow a parent to attend conferences about their own child, and others allow presence after notice to, or permission from, the school.

What the law says

Illinois’s school-presence ban for child sex offenders carves out a parent or guardian of a student who is attending a conference with school personnel about the child’s progress, or participating in conferences on evaluation and placement, under the conditions the statute sets.

Wisconsin exempts a parent whose child is enrolled if the parent notifies the school district administrator. North Dakota lets a school board adopt a written policy, and without one allows a parent on school property with written permission.

See the law720 ILCS 5/11-9.3(a); Wis. Stat. § 301.475(3); N.D. Cent. Code § 12.1-20-25

Registrants cannot drive through school zones.

Generally yes — presence laws target being on school property or loitering nearby.
The myth

Simply driving past a school is illegal for every registrant.

The reality

Most presence laws regulate being on school property, loitering near it, or living within a set distance — not passing by on a public road. Restrictions vary by state, supervision status and local law.

What the law says

Florida’s statute targets loitering or prowling within 300 feet of places where children congregate and being present on school grounds; Alabama’s targets loitering near child-focused locations and entering K-12 schools; Oklahoma defines a “zone of safety.”

Supervision conditions can go further — some forbid any travel past schools or require approved routes. If you are on supervision, the condition controls.

See the lawFla. Stat. § 856.022; Ala. Code § 15-20A-17; 21 O.S. § 1125

Registrants cannot attend college.

False — enrollment is legal; it must be reported, and campuses get notice.
The myth

People on the registry are legally barred from enrolling in higher education.

The reality

Many registrants attend colleges, universities and vocational schools. There is no nationwide prohibition. Enrollment must be reported, the campus community is told where registry information can be found, and individual institutions may have their own policies.

What the law says

Federal law requires registration in each jurisdiction where the offender is a student, with the school’s name and address. The Clery Act requires colleges to tell the campus community where law enforcement information about registered sex offenders can be obtained.

Some state school-presence laws expressly exclude colleges — North Carolina’s residency law says “school” does not include institutions of higher education — while campus housing and program admissions are set by each institution.

See the law34 U.S.C. §§ 20913(a), 20914(a)(5); 20 U.S.C. § 1092(f)(1)(I)

A principal’s permission always makes a school visit legal.

Only where the statute says so — some states recognize permission, others don’t, and supervision can override it.
The myth

If the school says yes, attending a graduation or any other school event cannot be a crime.

The reality

Attendance depends on state law, school policy, supervision conditions and the circumstances. Some state statutes recognize written permission from a principal or school board; others list only specific exceptions and give the school no power to waive the law.

What the law says

Wyoming exempts a registrant with written permission from the principal or vice-principal; Idaho requires written permission from the district before the first visit each school year; North Dakota relies on the school board’s written policy or permission; Virginia accepts a court order or the school board’s permission.

Florida’s statute, by contrast, lists its exceptions — voting, dropping off or picking up a child, religious services — and permission is not one of them. And a probation officer’s rule binds a person on supervision whatever the school says.

See the lawWyo. Stat. § 6-2-320; Idaho Code § 18-8329; Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-370.5; Fla. Stat. § 856.022

Public parks are off-limits to every registrant.

In most states yes — a minority of states restrict parks for some registrants.
The myth

Parents and relatives on the registry are banned from every park, playground and sporting event.

The reality

Access depends on state law, local ordinances, supervision conditions and the event. Most states have no statewide park ban, and the ones that do usually apply it to certain registrants, at certain times or within certain distances.

What the law says

Illinois bars child sex offenders from public parks when minors are present; Arkansas keeps Level 3 and 4 offenders 100 feet from water parks, swimming areas and playgrounds; Oklahoma has a “zone of safety”; North Dakota restricts moderate- and high-risk offenders in state parks; South Dakota bars loitering in community safety zones and public libraries.

Cities and counties add their own ordinances in many states — check locally before going.

See the law720 ILCS 5/11-9.3(a-10); Ark. Code § 5-14-134; 21 O.S. § 1125

Registrants cannot vote at schools used as polling places.

In many states yes — school-presence laws often have an express exception for voting.
The myth

If a polling place is inside a school, registrants automatically lose the right to vote there.

The reality

Many states that restrict school presence write in an exception for voting. Florida, Iowa, Idaho, Maryland, North Dakota, Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming all exempt a registrant who is at the school to vote. Whether a person is eligible to vote at all is a separate question, set by each state’s law on voting after a felony conviction.

What the law says

The exceptions are worded differently: Florida covers presence for voting during voting hours; Maryland requires that the person be registered to vote and that the school be their polling place; Wisconsin covers election days when the polling place is on the premises; Virginia requires that the person be a lawfully registered and qualified voter there solely to vote.

Where a state has no exception, or the person is on supervision with a stricter condition, ask the local election office about absentee or mail voting.

See the lawFla. Stat. § 856.022; Md. Code, Crim. Proc. § 11-722; Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-370.5(B)

Registrants cannot pick up their own children from school.

Often yes — several states write a drop-off and pick-up exception into the law.
The myth

Parents on the registry are automatically prohibited from picking up their children after school.

The reality

School access depends on state law, school policy, custody orders and supervision conditions. Several states expressly let a parent drop off or pick up their own child.

What the law says

Florida’s presence law does not apply to a parent, grandparent or legal guardian who is only dropping off or picking up their child or grandchild. Iowa lets a parent be in a restricted place for the time reasonably needed to transport their own child. Wyoming exempts a parent or guardian dropping off or picking up a child.

A custody order or supervision condition can still say otherwise.

See the lawFla. Stat. § 856.022; Iowa Code § 692A.113; Wyo. Stat. § 6-2-320

09 · Family & community · 9 myths

What does registration mean for marriage, children, holidays and church?

Family life is mostly governed by family courts, supervision conditions and a handful of state statutes — not by registration itself. A few rules, such as Halloween laws and co-residence bans, are being fought over in court right now.

Registrants automatically lose custody of their children.

False — courts decide custody; some state statutes add limits that are being litigated.
The myth

Being required to register as a sex offender means a parent automatically loses custody or visitation rights.

The reality

Family courts decide custody based on the best interests of the child, not on registry status alone. A qualifying offense can be a major factor, and some state laws add specific limits, but registration by itself does not terminate parental rights or end custody or visitation.

What the law says

Some states do legislate here. Alabama bars an adult registrant from living with a minor, but lets a parent live with their own child unless one of the listed conditions applies — parental rights terminated, a child of the household was the victim, or the offense involved a child.

In 2026 the full Eleventh Circuit held that the Alabama provision burdens the fundamental right of parents to live with their children and must pass strict scrutiny; on remand a panel held that one condition fails that test as applied to the plaintiff. The decision is not yet final.

See the lawAla. Code § 15-20A-11(d); Henry v. Sheriff of Tuscaloosa County (11th Cir. 2026)

Registrants cannot marry.

False — the right to marry survives even in prison; a name change must be reported.
The myth

Being on the registry makes it illegal to get married.

The reality

Registrants keep the legal right to marry. The Supreme Court has held that even prison inmates have a constitutional right to marry. What marriage can trigger is reporting: a name change, a new address, or a new household member.

What the law says

Federal law requires an in-person update within three business days of a change of name or residence. Florida specifically requires a report within 48 hours of a name change by marriage. Vermont requires notice within three days of a child under 18 moving into the registrant’s residence.

Supervision conditions can require permission before marrying or before living with someone who has children — check them separately.

See the lawTurner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987); 34 U.S.C. § 20913(c)

Registrants cannot live with their own children.

Usually yes — but some states restrict it, and those laws are being challenged.
The myth

Registry status automatically makes it illegal for a parent to live with their child.

The reality

Living arrangements depend on court orders, supervision conditions, child welfare decisions and state law. Registration alone does not prohibit living with one’s own children — but a few state statutes do restrict it in defined cases.

What the law says

Alabama bars an adult registrant from residing with a minor but allows parents, grandparents, stepparents and siblings unless a listed condition applies. In Henry v. Sheriff of Tuscaloosa County the full Eleventh Circuit held in 2026 that the ban burdens a fundamental parental right and must pass strict scrutiny; a panel then held one condition unconstitutional as applied to the plaintiff. The ruling is not yet final.

Supervision conditions and family-court or child-welfare orders can restrict contact regardless of what the registration statute says.

See the lawAla. Code § 15-20A-11(d)

Registrants cannot adopt children.

Very often not in foster-care adoption — federal law bars approval for listed felonies.
The myth

Being on the registry automatically makes adoption legally impossible.

The reality

Adoption depends on state law, the agency and the offense. Federal law requires fingerprint-based background checks of every prospective foster or adoptive parent in the federal Title IV-E program, and where federal payments are made for the child it bars final approval when the check shows certain felony convictions — including crimes against children and crimes of violence such as rape and sexual assault.

What the law says

The checks are required whether or not federal payments are made for the child; the mandatory bar applies in the cases where they are. Registrable offenses that are not among the listed felonies are left to the state’s home study and the court.

Private and stepparent adoptions are governed by state adoption law, which requires a court to find the adoption is in the child’s best interests — registry status will be weighed heavily.

See the law42 U.S.C. § 671(a)(20)

Grandparents on the registry cannot see their grandchildren.

It depends on the case — orders and conditions decide; several statutes make room for family.
The myth

Registry status automatically prohibits all contact with grandchildren.

The reality

Contact depends on court orders, supervision conditions, family court decisions and state law. Registration alone does not prohibit family relationships, and several state statutes expressly make room for grandparents.

What the law says

Alabama’s co-residence ban exempts grandparents unless a listed condition applies. South Carolina lets a judge permit internet communication with a grandchild where the person is not otherwise prohibited from contact. Florida’s school-presence law exempts a grandparent who is only dropping off or picking up a grandchild.

Utah allows a registrant to accompany a child under 14 with written authorization from the child’s parent, for the dates and places specified.

See the lawAla. Code § 15-20A-11(d); S.C. Code Ann. § 23-3-555; Utah Code § 53-29-307

Registrants automatically lose inheritance rights.

False — inheritance follows the will, trust or state probate law.
The myth

Being on the registry prevents someone from inheriting property.

The reality

Registry status does not affect inheritance rights. Who inherits is governed by wills, trusts and state probate law.

What the law says

The best-known criminal bar in inheritance law is the “slayer rule,” which prevents a person who unlawfully killed the decedent from inheriting. It has nothing to do with registration.

A person can, of course, be left out of a will by choice.

See the lawState probate law; the slayer rule

Marriage automatically ends registration.

False — marriage changes nothing, except that a new name must be reported.
The myth

Marrying someone removes a person’s obligation to register.

The reality

Marriage has no effect on registration. A registrant must keep complying unless legally relieved of the obligation — and a name change from marriage must itself be reported.

What the law says

Federal law requires an in-person update within three business days of a name change. Florida requires a report within 48 hours of a name change by marriage.

In Mississippi a registrant may not change their name at all except through marriage or divorce, and must show the certificate or decree.

See the law34 U.S.C. § 20913(c); Miss. Code Ann. § 45-33-30

Halloween rules apply to every registrant in every state.

Only in some states, or under supervision — and courts have struck down sign requirements.
The myth

Family gatherings, trick-or-treating and holiday events are automatically illegal for anyone on the registry.

The reality

Most registrants may attend family events. Halloween rules exist only where a statute, a local practice or a supervision condition creates them — and the U.S. Constitution limits what they can require.

What the law says

Missouri’s statute applies to registrants statewide on October 31: avoid Halloween-related contact with children, stay inside in the evening unless there is just cause, leave outside lights off, and post a sign reading “No candy or treats at this residence.” The Eighth Circuit held in January 2026 that the sign requirement compels speech, but the injunction now protects only the plaintiff, the rest of the statute was not challenged, and a petition for Supreme Court review is pending. Illinois bars child sex offenders from holiday events involving children, including handing out candy on Halloween.

In Georgia, the Eleventh Circuit held in McClendon v. Long that a sheriff could not make registrants put “No Trick-or-Treat” signs in their yards.

See the lawMo. Rev. Stat. § 589.426; 720 ILCS 5/11-9.3(c-2)

Registrants can’t attend church.

Generally yes — a few states restrict places of worship in specific ways.
The myth

Weddings, funerals, worship services and other ceremonies are automatically off limits to registrants.

The reality

Most registrants may attend weddings, funerals and religious services. Restrictions come from supervision conditions, court orders or location-based laws — and some state laws expressly protect worship.

What the law says

Florida’s school-presence law has an express exception for attending a religious service. Arkansas, on the other hand, includes churches and other places of worship among the places Level 3 and Level 4 offenders may not live near.

Churches with schools, nurseries or youth programs can fall under school or child-care rules, and some congregations set their own attendance agreements.

See the lawFla. Stat. § 856.022; Ark. Code § 5-14-128

About this page

A myth earns a place here when people repeat it — in forums, in the news, in conversations with family, employers and landlords. Each answer is written to the same standard as the Registry Wire and the Case Law Library: the statute, regulation or opinion is the source, every source is linked, and nothing is paraphrased into a rule the law does not contain. State examples are drawn from the statute text collected in LawLookup. Each card shows the date it was last verified.

Spotted something out of date, or a myth we should add? Tell us — include the statute or decision if you have it.

Legal Disclaimer

These are plain-language summaries written for general education. Registration law differs by state, changes often, and applies differently depending on the offense, the date of conviction and any supervision a person is under. A rule that applies in one state may not apply in another, and a supervision condition can be stricter than the statute. Read the law itself, check with your registering agency, and talk to a lawyer licensed in your state before relying on anything here. This page is not legal advice.