What happened
In October 2018, Butts County, Georgia deputies placed signs reading “STOP / NO TRICK-OR-TREAT AT THIS ADDRESS” in the yards of all 57 registrants in the county. Three registrants sued before Halloween 2019.
22 F.4th 1330 (11th Cir. 2022)
A Georgia sheriff could not make registrants display “No Trick-or-Treat” signs in their yards. That is compelled speech.
Good law. Still followed. Later cases may have narrowed it — see Scope. Binds federal courts in its circuit only. Persuasive, not binding, everywhere else.
In October 2018, Butts County, Georgia deputies placed signs reading “STOP / NO TRICK-OR-TREAT AT THIS ADDRESS” in the yards of all 57 registrants in the county. Three registrants sued before Halloween 2019.
The Eleventh Circuit held the signs were government speech and that forcing homeowners to display them is compelled speech violating the First Amendment, with no evidence that registrants posed a danger to trick-or-treaters. The court reversed in part, directing a permanent injunction for the homeowner, and vacated and remanded for the two plaintiffs who lived on their parents’ property to determine their property interest.
It was the first federal appeals ruling against Halloween signs and a model for the later challenge to Missouri’s sign statute in Sanderson v. Hanaway.
It concerned a sheriff’s policy, not a state statute. It did not decide whether signs placed on public rights-of-way are allowed or whether other Halloween restrictions, such as staying home or leaving lights off, are valid.
Last verified against the sources above on September 30, 2026.
These are plain-language summaries of court decisions, written for general education. A ruling binds only the courts beneath the court that issued it, later decisions and new laws can change what it means, and how it applies to any one person depends on facts a summary cannot capture. Read the opinion itself, and talk to a lawyer licensed in your state before relying on any case. This page is not legal advice.