State appeals court Good law

Douglas v. State

No. 2D20-3196 (Fla. 2d DCA Feb. 11, 2022)

Losing a GPS tracking unit is not a willful violation of probation without evidence of a deliberate act causing the loss.

Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Decided
February 11, 2022
Reach
Binding on Florida trial courts absent a conflicting district decision
Verified
October 22, 2026

Good law. Still followed. Later cases may have narrowed it — see Scope. Binds lower courts in its district or state until the state high court says otherwise.

What happened

A Lee County probationer, on probation after community control for failing to register, was found in violation for “losing his RTC GPS Unit,” which caused a “bracelet gone” alert, and was sentenced to 364 days in jail. The trial court noted that no testimony explained how the unit reached the place it was found.

What the court decided

A unanimous panel reversed: “the record contains no evidence that Douglas willfully acted in a manner to cause the loss of the GPS unit,” so the State did not prove a willful and substantial violation. It remanded for reinstatement of probation.

Why it matters to the Registry

It applies to the two-piece RTC unit the rule that a violation caused by “negligence or ineptitude” is not willful, and it shows how much jail time can attach to an equipment violation before an appeal.

What it did not decide

It is a holding on the sufficiency of one record. It does not say losing a unit can never be willful, and it distinguishes cases with repeated failures to carry or charge the device. It did not reach the sentencing issue.

Developments

  1. “Bracelet gone” alert after the RTC unit is lost, per the trial court’s order.

  2. Second District reverses and remands for reinstatement of probation.

Legal Disclaimer

These are plain-language summaries of court decisions, written for general education. A ruling binds only the courts beneath the court that issued it, later decisions and new laws can change what it means, and how it applies to any one person depends on facts a summary cannot capture. Read the opinion itself, and talk to a lawyer licensed in your state before relying on any case. This page is not legal advice.